Disadvantages of triple glazing
We look at the common misconceptions about triple glazing that have been perceived as 'disadvantages'.
The difference between U-values clearly demonstrates that triple glazing is a superior product in comparison to single and double glazed windows, especially for energy efficiency, and there are no real disadvantages.
In Northern European countries, triple glazing is the standard. At Everest, we want to drive change in the UK market to introduce more triple glazing and to offer homeowners the best possible products to insulate their homes.
Currently, most UK window companies have an older frame specification and cannot offer a triple glazing product comparable to the European market. We anticipate this to change in the next few years.
Because of this lack of investment, there has been negative debate about how effective triple glazing is for the UK market. Below we respond to these misconceptions about the ‘disadvantages’ of triple glazing.
Can we benefit in the UK?
Due to the considerably colder weather, in Scandinavian countries, triple glazing is the standard install. In the UK we have been replacing single glazed windows with double glazing since the 1970s.
It has been said that the efficiency of double glazing is effective enough against the climate in the UK - in comparison to the cold of Scandinavia.
However, triple glazing is superior for energy efficiency.
Standard double glazed windows have a WER rating of A, with A+ being the best rating on offer. Everest triple glazed windows achieve A++ rating for their efficiency.
Triple glazing is 24% more efficient than the best double glazing with a Uw rating of 0.99 compared to 1.3. Upgrading from old double glazing to Everest triple glazing can expect a 60% increase in energy efficiency according to the difference in U-values.
Is the extra cost worth it?
There are articles online that claim triple glazing is not cost effective enough for a mild climate in the UK. That might have been true several years ago when triple glazing was considerbaly more expensive, but Everest triple glazing is only 10%-20% more than double glazing.
Cost aside, there are many advantages of triple glazing and the cost comparison of two products shouldn't be the only factor to make inform a decision.
The additional comfort in a living space that can be achieved by installing triple glazing can increase the quality of life in the home alongside saving money on bills.
Extra weight of triple glazing
Glass is heavy and triple glazing weighs more than double or single glazing. That extra weight means that the frame and installation must fully support the difference.
Triple glazing is heavier due to the extra pane of glass - but a correctly specified window will only be built to a size that can carry the weight. At Everest, we make sure we calculate the right glass sizes and have maximum sizes we can fit to. We also fit heavy duty friction stays to support the extra weight of any opening windows.
Extra thickness of the frame
Alongside the additional weight, the thickness of the window frame has to be considered for replacement windows.
The standard depth of a double glazed unit is 28mm and the standard size of a triple glazed unit is 36mm.
For some companies that extra depth on the triple glazed unit means that triple glazing cannot be fitted into their frame sizes.
Everest double and triple glazed units both fit into the same uPVC frame profile – this is because we have developed a thinner glazing bead to hold the wider sealed unit in place that is unobtrusive and very hard to spot.
Sound reduction is not as good as you would expect
You might think that three layers of glass are better than two for reducing noise, but, surprisingly, noise reducing double glazing is better. Standard triple glazing can experience vibrations on the internal pane to amplify sounds.
If noise pollution is important to you, we recommend our double glazing with noise reducing glass, which has been designed to be more efficient at reducing noise.