There has been some negative press about how long it can take to pay back the investment and if triple glazing is worth the additional cost. Does the cost saving on energy bills justify the difference in price between double and triple glazing?
In the UK, triple glazing has been seen as a ‘luxury’ option for windows and not the standard install of Scandinavian and some European countries. However, triple glazing is not just about how long it takes to pay back the investment of installation.
There are several reasons why triple glazing is worth it (or isn’t).
Why U values are important
The Window Energy Rating (WER) was introduced to compare the energy efficiency of different windows.
WER uses G-values for solar gain and U-values for heat transmission as part of its calculation.
WER is generally a good rating system to compare like-for-like products from different manufacturers, but when you are considering different rooms with specific needs, then it’s better to look at individual values separately.
Windows are predominantly a means to allow natural light into a room whilst keeping the space dry with a consistent room temperature. In the UK, we don’t experience the same levels of cold in winter as Scandinavia, but the predominant need is still to reduce heat loss and the U-value is the metric of focus.
A U-value measures the heat transfer through a material – the lower the U-value, the greater the energy efficiency. Building Regulations require all replacement windows to be 1.4 W/m2K, or lower.
Single glazed windows can be 4.8 W/m2K or more. Double glazing ranges from 2.4 W/m2K for old windows to 1.3 W/m2K for modern Everest Double glazed windows with Argon gas and warm edge spacers.
Everest Triple glazed windows are rated at 1.0 W/m2K.
The benefit of houses built with low U-value components are:
- Increased room comfort
- Energy bill savings
- Less surface mould growth
- Improved building health